Re: [PATCH 3/3] IO: hid-sensor-magn-3d: Add in support for True/Magnetic North HID usages

[Srinivas Pandruvada]

On 05/28/2014 02:15 PM, Reyad Attiyat wrote:
> > +static void sensor_hub_fill_attr_info(
> > +               struct hid_sensor_hub_attribute_info *info,
> > +               s32 index, s32 report_id, struct hid_field *field)
> > +{
> > +       info->index = index;
> > +       info->report_id = report_id;
> > +       info->units = field->unit;
> > +       info->unit_expo = field->unit_exponent;
> > +       info->size = (field->report_size * field->report_count)/8;
> > +       info->logical_minimum = field->logical_minimum;
> > +       info->logical_maximum = field->logical_maximum;
> >   }
> I copied this function from hid/hid-sensor-hub.c as it is marked
> static in that file. I use it to fill attributes as I find them.
> Should I create an another patch to make it non-static?

I didn't check your implementation. But 
sensor_hub_input_get_attribute_info()
function is not enough? We are already using to get other attributes for 
x, y and Z.

Thanks,
Srinivas


> > +       list_for_each_entry(report, &report_enum->report_list, list) {
> > +               for (i = 0; i < report->maxfield; ++i) {
> > +                       field = report->field[i];
> > +
> > +                       for (j = 0; j < field->maxusage; j++) {
> > +                               usage = &(field->usage[j]);
> > +
> This is how I mange to find all possible hid reports in the parse
> reports function. I noticed that in the other function that was used,
> sensor_hub_input_get_attribute_info(),  it only uses field->usage[0].
> Is there a reason for this and should I change my current
> implementation?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/