Re: [PATCH 01/27] mtd: nand: introduce function to fix a common bug in most nand-drivers not showing a device in sysfs

From: Alexander Holler
Date: Wed May 28 2014 - 23:54:15 EST


Am 28.05.2014 23:49, schrieb Brian Norris:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:05PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
I'm very sorry, but I find such discussions extremly tiresome.

If you just would have suggested that one if to prevent that someone who
doesn't c&p existing code would end up with a clobbered name (which he
obviously can't miss if he ever would test his new or changed driver),
than I maybe would have send a v2 with that if. But all the other noise
just made me to want I never had send (again) a patch to LKML. It is
almost impossible to avoid such answers and it turns every patch posting
into a endless story where people do want to discuss every line or even
character of totally silly things.

It would help if you brought a more open attitude to the table.

Your doesn't accept that other people do write code different than you and you want to tell me I have to bring a more open attitude to the table?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/