Re: [PATCH] CMA: correct unlock target

[Laura Abbott]

On 5/29/2014 12:34 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 2014-05-29 08:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> 'cma: Remove potential deadlock situation' introduces per cma area mutex
>> for bitmap management. It is good, but there is one mistake. When we
>> can't find appropriate area in bitmap, we release cma_mutex global lock
>> rather than cma->lock and this is a bug. So fix it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks for spotting this issue. I've added it to my tree.
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
>> index 6f6bffc..83969f8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
>> @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ struct page *dma_alloc_from_contiguous(struct device *dev, int count,
>>           pageno = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(cma->bitmap, cma->count,
>>                               start, count, mask);
>>           if (pageno >= cma->count) {
>> -            mutex_unlock(&cma_mutex);
>> +            mutex_unlock(&cma->lock);
>>               break;
>>           }
>>           bitmap_set(cma->bitmap, pageno, count);
> 
> Best regards

Acked-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Who actually ended up picking up that patch? I sent it out but didn't realize it had been
picked up.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/