Re: [PATCH v4] openrisc: irq: use irqchip framework

From: Stefan Kristiansson
Date: Thu May 29 2014 - 16:29:28 EST


On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 08:47:36AM +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> On 05/26/2014 10:52 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > CC devicetree for the bindings
> >
> > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Stefan Kristiansson
> > <stefan.kristiansson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/opencores,or1k-pic.txt
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> >> +OpenRISC 1000 Programmable Interrupt Controller
> >> +
> >> +Required properties:
> >> +
> >> +- compatible : should be "opencores,or1k-pic-level" for variants with
> >> + level triggered interrupt lines, "opencores,or1k-pic-edge" for variants with
> >> + edge triggered interrupt lines or "opencores,or1200-pic" for machines
> >> + with the non-spec compliant or1200 type implementation.
> >> +
> >> + "opencores,or1k-pic" is also provided as an alias to "opencores,or1200-pic",
> >> + but this is only for backwards compatibility.
>
> I still think this identifier needs to be versioned. Use the same
> version number as we have on the cpu identifier since the OR1200 PIC
> hasn't changed since then; i.e. opencores,or1200-pic-rtlsvnXYZ.
>

I can change that if you *really* insist on it...
But I don't understand the purpose of the versioning here,
there will never be any other or1200-pic version than the one that currently
exists, so IMO "or1200" should be enough versioning information.

Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/