Re: [PATCH V4 1/8] opp: of_init_opp_table(): return -ENOSYS when feature isn't implemented

[Nishanth Menon]

minor (Rafael usually fixes it up, but still):
$subject: PM / OPP:

On 05/27/2014 06:50 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> When none of CONFIG_PM_OPP or CONFIG_OF is enabled we use the dummy
> implementation of of_init_opp_table() routine, which returns -EINVAL currently.
> -EINVAL can confuse the callers a bit as it can have other meanings for the
> actual implementation of this routine.
> 
> It is more appropriate to return -ENOSYS instead to avoid confusion at caller.
> 
> Suggested-and-reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

otherwise,

Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>

> ---
>  include/linux/pm_opp.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_opp.h b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> index 0330217..6668150 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev);
>  #else
>  static inline int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	return -EINVAL;
> +	return -ENOSYS;
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> 


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/