Re: [RFC PATCH] clk: flatten clk tree in debugfs

[Peter De Schrijver]

> >>
> >> Mike, others,
> >>
> >> Any objections to this idea? If there's not much opposition, then maybe
> >> Peter can actually spend time fixing and testing this patch?
> >
> > Idea seems fine. I had actually considered removing the hiearchal
> > directory structure completely with the advent of clk_dump and
> > clk_summary, but if there is value in the flattened directory structure
> > then I'm all for it.
> I think the additional value of the flattened directory probably comes 
> from internal tree patches that would add set rate capability to clocks, 
> etc that would be helpful with testing.
> 

Yes. Eg. I posted a patch to dump a clocks registers for Tegra.

> Agree with all the comments so far.
> 
> Peter,
> 
> Looks like there's some support and no opposition so far. So do you want 
> to send out a real patch that's been tested and with the comments above 
> taken care of?

Yes. I will do that.

Cheers,

Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/