Re: [PATCH RFC - TAKE TWO - 02/12] block, bfq: add full hierarchical scheduling and cgroups support

[Paolo Valente]

Il giorno 30/mag/2014, alle ore 17:37, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:

> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:05:33AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h b/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h
>> index 768fe44..cdd2528 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h
>> @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ SUBSYS(net_cls)
>> SUBSYS(blkio)
>> #endif
>> 
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CGROUP_BFQIO)
>> +SUBSYS(bfqio)
>> +#endif
> 
> So, ummm, I don't think this is a good idea.  Why aren't you plugging
> into the blkcg infrastructure as cfq does?  Why does it need to be a
> separate controller?
> 

It does not, actually. It is just that when we implemented that part, there was no blkcg infrastructure. After that, I have gone on experimenting with the low-latency heuristics and all the other stuff. Finally I have decided to first propose this new version of bfq, and then deal also with blkcg integration in case of a positive welcome.

Thanks,
Paolo

> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> tejun


--
Paolo Valente                                                 
Algogroup
Dipartimento di Fisica, Informatica e Matematica		
Via Campi, 213/B
41125 Modena - Italy        				  
homepage:  http://algogroup.unimore.it/people/paolo/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/