Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/86] 3.10.41-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 01:44:02PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 05/29/2014 08:32 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >On 05/28/2014 09:36 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.41 release.
> >>There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >>to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >>let me know.
> >>
> >>Responses should be made by Sat May 31 04:34:49 UTC 2014.
> >>Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>
> >
> >Build results:
> >     total: 143 pass: 134 skipped: 6 fail: 3
> >
> >Qemu tests all passed.
> >
> >For reference, failing builds are
> >
> >unicore32:defconfig        - still fails for all releases
> >powerpc:ppc64e_defconfig    - fail if built with binutils 2.4; patch
> >pending
> >powerpc:chroma_defconfig    - fail if built with binutils 2.4; patch
> >pending
> >
> >Results are as expected. Details are available at
> >http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
> >
> 
> Compiled and booted on my test systems. No dmesg regressions.

Thanks for testing.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/