[PATCH 10/27] perf ui/hist: Add support to accumulated hist stat
From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Sun Jun 01 2014 - 09:36:34 EST
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Print accumulated stat of a hist entry if requested.
To do that, add new HPP_PERCENT_ACC_FNS macro and generate a
perf_hpp_fmt using it. The __hpp__sort_acc() function sorts entries
by accumulated period value. When accumulated periods of two entries
are same (i.e. single path callchain) put the caller above since
accumulation tends to put callers on higher position for obvious
reason.
Also add "overhead_children" output field to be selected by user.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Arun Sharma <asharma@xxxxxx>
Tested-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1401335910-16832-11-git-send-email-namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/ui/hist.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/util/hist.h | 4 ++
tools/perf/util/sort.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 104 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
index 4484f5b..0ce3e79 100644
--- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
@@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ int __hpp__fmt(struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he,
return ret;
}
+int __hpp__fmt_acc(struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he,
+ hpp_field_fn get_field, const char *fmt,
+ hpp_snprint_fn print_fn, bool fmt_percent)
+{
+ if (!symbol_conf.cumulate_callchain) {
+ return snprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size, "%*s",
+ fmt_percent ? 8 : 12, "N/A");
+ }
+
+ return __hpp__fmt(hpp, he, get_field, fmt, print_fn, fmt_percent);
+}
+
static int field_cmp(u64 field_a, u64 field_b)
{
if (field_a > field_b)
@@ -160,6 +172,24 @@ out:
return ret;
}
+static int __hpp__sort_acc(struct hist_entry *a, struct hist_entry *b,
+ hpp_field_fn get_field)
+{
+ s64 ret = 0;
+
+ if (symbol_conf.cumulate_callchain) {
+ /*
+ * Put caller above callee when they have equal period.
+ */
+ ret = field_cmp(get_field(a), get_field(b));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = b->callchain->max_depth - a->callchain->max_depth;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
#define __HPP_HEADER_FN(_type, _str, _min_width, _unit_width) \
static int hpp__header_##_type(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused, \
struct perf_hpp *hpp, \
@@ -242,6 +272,34 @@ static int64_t hpp__sort_##_type(struct hist_entry *a, struct hist_entry *b) \
return __hpp__sort(a, b, he_get_##_field); \
}
+#define __HPP_COLOR_ACC_PERCENT_FN(_type, _field) \
+static u64 he_get_acc_##_field(struct hist_entry *he) \
+{ \
+ return he->stat_acc->_field; \
+} \
+ \
+static int hpp__color_##_type(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused, \
+ struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he) \
+{ \
+ return __hpp__fmt_acc(hpp, he, he_get_acc_##_field, " %6.2f%%", \
+ hpp_color_scnprintf, true); \
+}
+
+#define __HPP_ENTRY_ACC_PERCENT_FN(_type, _field) \
+static int hpp__entry_##_type(struct perf_hpp_fmt *_fmt __maybe_unused, \
+ struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he) \
+{ \
+ const char *fmt = symbol_conf.field_sep ? " %.2f" : " %6.2f%%"; \
+ return __hpp__fmt_acc(hpp, he, he_get_acc_##_field, fmt, \
+ hpp_entry_scnprintf, true); \
+}
+
+#define __HPP_SORT_ACC_FN(_type, _field) \
+static int64_t hpp__sort_##_type(struct hist_entry *a, struct hist_entry *b) \
+{ \
+ return __hpp__sort_acc(a, b, he_get_acc_##_field); \
+}
+
#define __HPP_ENTRY_RAW_FN(_type, _field) \
static u64 he_get_raw_##_field(struct hist_entry *he) \
{ \
@@ -270,18 +328,27 @@ __HPP_COLOR_PERCENT_FN(_type, _field) \
__HPP_ENTRY_PERCENT_FN(_type, _field) \
__HPP_SORT_FN(_type, _field)
+#define HPP_PERCENT_ACC_FNS(_type, _str, _field, _min_width, _unit_width)\
+__HPP_HEADER_FN(_type, _str, _min_width, _unit_width) \
+__HPP_WIDTH_FN(_type, _min_width, _unit_width) \
+__HPP_COLOR_ACC_PERCENT_FN(_type, _field) \
+__HPP_ENTRY_ACC_PERCENT_FN(_type, _field) \
+__HPP_SORT_ACC_FN(_type, _field)
+
#define HPP_RAW_FNS(_type, _str, _field, _min_width, _unit_width) \
__HPP_HEADER_FN(_type, _str, _min_width, _unit_width) \
__HPP_WIDTH_FN(_type, _min_width, _unit_width) \
__HPP_ENTRY_RAW_FN(_type, _field) \
__HPP_SORT_RAW_FN(_type, _field)
+__HPP_HEADER_FN(overhead_self, "Self", 8, 8)
HPP_PERCENT_FNS(overhead, "Overhead", period, 8, 8)
HPP_PERCENT_FNS(overhead_sys, "sys", period_sys, 8, 8)
HPP_PERCENT_FNS(overhead_us, "usr", period_us, 8, 8)
HPP_PERCENT_FNS(overhead_guest_sys, "guest sys", period_guest_sys, 9, 8)
HPP_PERCENT_FNS(overhead_guest_us, "guest usr", period_guest_us, 9, 8)
+HPP_PERCENT_ACC_FNS(overhead_acc, "Children", period, 8, 8)
HPP_RAW_FNS(samples, "Samples", nr_events, 12, 12)
HPP_RAW_FNS(period, "Period", period, 12, 12)
@@ -303,6 +370,17 @@ static int64_t hpp__nop_cmp(struct hist_entry *a __maybe_unused,
.sort = hpp__sort_ ## _name, \
}
+#define HPP__COLOR_ACC_PRINT_FNS(_name) \
+ { \
+ .header = hpp__header_ ## _name, \
+ .width = hpp__width_ ## _name, \
+ .color = hpp__color_ ## _name, \
+ .entry = hpp__entry_ ## _name, \
+ .cmp = hpp__nop_cmp, \
+ .collapse = hpp__nop_cmp, \
+ .sort = hpp__sort_ ## _name, \
+ }
+
#define HPP__PRINT_FNS(_name) \
{ \
.header = hpp__header_ ## _name, \
@@ -319,6 +397,7 @@ struct perf_hpp_fmt perf_hpp__format[] = {
HPP__COLOR_PRINT_FNS(overhead_us),
HPP__COLOR_PRINT_FNS(overhead_guest_sys),
HPP__COLOR_PRINT_FNS(overhead_guest_us),
+ HPP__COLOR_ACC_PRINT_FNS(overhead_acc),
HPP__PRINT_FNS(samples),
HPP__PRINT_FNS(period)
};
@@ -328,16 +407,23 @@ LIST_HEAD(perf_hpp__sort_list);
#undef HPP__COLOR_PRINT_FNS
+#undef HPP__COLOR_ACC_PRINT_FNS
#undef HPP__PRINT_FNS
#undef HPP_PERCENT_FNS
+#undef HPP_PERCENT_ACC_FNS
#undef HPP_RAW_FNS
#undef __HPP_HEADER_FN
#undef __HPP_WIDTH_FN
#undef __HPP_COLOR_PERCENT_FN
#undef __HPP_ENTRY_PERCENT_FN
+#undef __HPP_COLOR_ACC_PERCENT_FN
+#undef __HPP_ENTRY_ACC_PERCENT_FN
#undef __HPP_ENTRY_RAW_FN
+#undef __HPP_SORT_FN
+#undef __HPP_SORT_ACC_FN
+#undef __HPP_SORT_RAW_FN
void perf_hpp__init(void)
@@ -361,6 +447,13 @@ void perf_hpp__init(void)
if (field_order)
return;
+ if (symbol_conf.cumulate_callchain) {
+ perf_hpp__column_enable(PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD_ACC);
+
+ perf_hpp__format[PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD].header =
+ hpp__header_overhead_self;
+ }
+
perf_hpp__column_enable(PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD);
if (symbol_conf.show_cpu_utilization) {
@@ -383,6 +476,12 @@ void perf_hpp__init(void)
list = &perf_hpp__format[PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD].sort_list;
if (list_empty(list))
list_add(list, &perf_hpp__sort_list);
+
+ if (symbol_conf.cumulate_callchain) {
+ list = &perf_hpp__format[PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD_ACC].sort_list;
+ if (list_empty(list))
+ list_add(list, &perf_hpp__sort_list);
+ }
}
void perf_hpp__column_register(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.h b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
index 78409f9..efd73e4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
@@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ enum {
PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD_US,
PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD_GUEST_SYS,
PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD_GUEST_US,
+ PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD_ACC,
PERF_HPP__SAMPLES,
PERF_HPP__PERIOD,
@@ -254,6 +255,9 @@ typedef int (*hpp_snprint_fn)(struct perf_hpp *hpp, const char *fmt, ...);
int __hpp__fmt(struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he,
hpp_field_fn get_field, const char *fmt,
hpp_snprint_fn print_fn, bool fmt_percent);
+int __hpp__fmt_acc(struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he,
+ hpp_field_fn get_field, const char *fmt,
+ hpp_snprint_fn print_fn, bool fmt_percent);
static inline void advance_hpp(struct perf_hpp *hpp, int inc)
{
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.c b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
index 901b9be..9da8931 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/sort.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
@@ -1061,6 +1061,7 @@ static struct hpp_dimension hpp_sort_dimensions[] = {
DIM(PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD_US, "overhead_us"),
DIM(PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD_GUEST_SYS, "overhead_guest_sys"),
DIM(PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD_GUEST_US, "overhead_guest_us"),
+ DIM(PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD_ACC, "overhead_children"),
DIM(PERF_HPP__SAMPLES, "sample"),
DIM(PERF_HPP__PERIOD, "period"),
};
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/