[PATCH V2 2/3] regulators: Add definition of regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG_REGULATOR

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Mon Jun 02 2014 - 03:29:52 EST

We already have dummy implementation for most of the regulators APIs for
!CONFIG_REGULATOR case and were missing it for regulator_set_voltage_time().

Found this issue while compiling cpufreq-cpu0 driver without regulators support
in kernel.

drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c: In function âcpu0_cpufreq_probeâ:
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c:186:3: error: implicit declaration of function âregulator_set_voltage_timeâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Fix this by adding dummy definition for regulator_set_voltage_time().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
V1->V2: return -EINVAL instead of zero.

include/linux/regulator/consumer.h | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h b/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h
index 28fa089..7563f8b 100644
--- a/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h
+++ b/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h
@@ -397,6 +397,12 @@ static inline int regulator_set_voltage(struct regulator *regulator,
return -EINVAL;

+static inline int regulator_set_voltage_time(struct regulator *regulator,
+ int old_uV, int new_uV)
+ return -EINVAL;
static inline int regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator *regulator)
return -EINVAL;

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/