Re: [PATCH 0/3] Qualcomm Resource Power Manager driver

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:15:24AM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:

> > Lately I've been working on rpm, rpm-smd, smem, smd, smsm, smp2p
> > patches for mainline.
> > It could be argued that smd is a bus and should go in drivers/bus, but
> > for the rest I fear that we just created drivers/soc/qcom as another
> > dumping ground for things; a "Qualcomm specific drivers/mfd".

> Do we have some obstacles to not use a "common mailbox framework" for
> this IPC (shared memory) communication. It looks that it fits very well
> with our needs for this rpm-regulator and future submitting of smd driver?

Jassi (CCed) has been working on just such a thing.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature