Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: introduce fincore()
From: Kirill A. Shutemov
Date: Mon Jun 02 2014 - 08:24:18 EST
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 01:24:58AM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> This patch provides a new system call fincore(2), which provides mincore()-
> like information, i.e. page residency of a given file. But unlike mincore(),
> fincore() can have a mode flag and it enables us to extract more detailed
> information about page cache like pfn and page flag. This kind of information
> is very helpful for example when applications want to know the file cache
> status to control IO on their own way.
>
> Detail about the data format being passed to userspace are explained in
> inline comment, but generally in long entry format, we can choose which
> information is extraced flexibly, so you don't have to waste memory by
> extracting unnecessary information. And with FINCORE_SKIP_HOLE flag,
> we can skip hole pages (not on memory,) which makes us avoid a flood of
> meaningless zero entries when calling on extremely large (but only few
> pages of it are loaded on memory) file.
>
> Basic testset is added in a next patch on tools/testing/selftests/fincore/.
>
> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1439212/focus=1441919
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
...
> diff --git v3.15-rc7.orig/mm/fincore.c v3.15-rc7/mm/fincore.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3fc3ef465471
> --- /dev/null
> +++ v3.15-rc7/mm/fincore.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,362 @@
> +/*
> + * fincore(2) system call
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2014 NEC Corporation, Naoya Horiguchi
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/syscalls.h>
> +#include <linux/pagemap.h>
> +#include <linux/file.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * You can control how the buffer in userspace is filled with this mode
> + * parameters:
> + *
> + * - FINCORE_BMAP:
> + * The page status is returned in a vector of bytes.
> + * The least significant bit of each byte is 1 if the referenced page
> + * is in memory, otherwise it is zero.
I'm okay with bytemap. Just wounder why not bitmap?
> + *
> + * - FINCORE_PFN:
> + * stores pfn, using 8 bytes.
> + *
> + * - FINCORE_PAGEFLAGS:
> + * stores page flags, using 8 bytes. See definition of KPF_* for details.
> + *
> + * - FINCORE_PAGECACHE_TAGS:
> + * stores pagecache tags, using 8 bytes. See definition of PAGECACHE_TAG_*
> + * for details.
Is it safe to expose this info to unprivilaged process (consider all three
flags above)?
> + * - FINCORE_SKIP_HOLE: if this flag is set, fincore() doesn't store any
> + * information about hole. Instead each records per page has the entry
> + * of page offset (using 8 bytes.) This mode is useful if we handle
> + * large file and only few pages are on memory for the file.
Hm.. It's probably overkill, but instead of filling userspace buffer we
could return file descriptor and define lseek(SEEK_HOLE). Just thinking.
> + *
> + * FINCORE_BMAP shouldn't be used combined with any other flags, and returnd
> + * data in this mode is like this:
> + *
> + * page offset 0 1 2 3 4
> + * +---+---+---+---+---+
> + * | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ...
> + * +---+---+---+---+---+
> + * <->
> + * 1 byte
> + *
> + * For FINCORE_PFN, page data is formatted like this:
> + *
> + * page offset 0 1 2 3 4
> + * +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
> + * | pfn | pfn | pfn | pfn | pfn | ...
> + * +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
> + * <----->
> + * 8 byte
> + *
> + * We can use multiple flags among FINCORE_(PFN|PAGEFLAGS|PAGECACHE_TAGS).
> + * For example, when the mode is FINCORE_PFN|FINCORE_PAGEFLAGS, the per-page
> + * information is stored like this:
> + *
> + * page offset 0 page offset 1 page offset 2
> + * +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
> + * | pfn | flags | pfn | flags | pfn | flags | ...
> + * +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
> + * <-------------> <-------------> <------------->
> + * 16 bytes 16 bytes 16 bytes
> + *
> + * When FINCORE_SKIP_HOLE is set, we ignore holes and add page offset entry
> + * (8 bytes) instead. For example, the data format of mode
> + * FINCORE_PFN|FINCORE_SKIP_HOLE is like follows:
> + *
> + * +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
> + * | pgoff | pfn | pgoff | pfn | pgoff | pfn | ...
> + * +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
> + * <-------------> <-------------> <------------->
> + * 16 bytes 16 bytes 16 bytes
> + */
> +#define FINCORE_BMAP 0x01 /* bytemap mode */
> +#define FINCORE_PFN 0x02
> +#define FINCORE_PAGE_FLAGS 0x04
> +#define FINCORE_PAGECACHE_TAGS 0x08
> +#define FINCORE_SKIP_HOLE 0x10
FINCORE_SKIP_HOLE is greater then FINCORE_PFN but pgoff precedes pfn in
records. It's confusing. We need clear definition of record format.
What about rename FINCORE_SKIP_HOLE -> FINCORE_PGOFF, move it before
FINCORE_PFN. So FINCORE_PGOFF is less than FINCORE_PFN, which is less than
FINCORE_PAGE_FLAGS, which is less than FINCORE_PAGECACHE_TAGS. It matches
order in records:
FINCORE_PGOFF|FINCORE_PFN|FINCORE_PAGEFLAGS|FINCORE_PAGECACHE_TAGS
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| pgoff | pfn | flags | tags | pgoff | pfn | flags | tags | ...
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
<-----------------------------> <------------------------------>
32 bytes 32 bytes
> +
> +#define FINCORE_MODE_MASK 0x1f
> +#define FINCORE_LONGENTRY_MASK (FINCORE_PFN | FINCORE_PAGE_FLAGS | \
> + FINCORE_PAGECACHE_TAGS | FINCORE_SKIP_HOLE)
> +
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/