Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: add secure firmware support to AFTR mode code

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 06/02/2014 02:35 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> * Use do_idle firmware method instead of cpu_do_idle() on boards with
>    secure firmware enabled.
>
> * Use sysram_ns_base_addr + 0x24 address for exynos_boot_vector_addr()
>    and sysram_ns_base_addr + 0x20 one for exynos_boot_vector_flag() on
>    boards with secure firmware enabled.
>
> This patch fixes hang on an attempt to enter AFTR mode for TRATS2
> board (which uses EXYNOS4412 SoC with secure firmware enabled).
>
> This patch shouldn't cause any functionality changes on boards that
> don't use secure firmware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c        | 8 ++++++--
>   drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c | 7 ++++++-
>   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> index 0fb9a5a..62a0a5e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,9 @@ int exynos_cluster_power_state(int cluster)
>
>   static inline void __iomem *exynos_boot_vector_addr(void)
>   {
> -	if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1)
> +	if (firmware_run())
> +		return sysram_ns_base_addr + 0x24;
> +	else if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1)
>   		return S5P_INFORM7;
>   	else if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0)
>   		return sysram_base_addr + 0x24;
> @@ -178,7 +180,9 @@ static inline void __iomem *exynos_boot_vector_addr(void)
>
>   static inline void __iomem *exynos_boot_vector_flag(void)
>   {
> -	if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1)
> +	if (firmware_run())
> +		return sysram_ns_base_addr + 0x20;
> +	else if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1)
>   		return S5P_INFORM6;
>   	else if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0)
>   		return sysram_base_addr + 0x20;
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c
> index 7c01512..f90a4a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c
> @@ -17,13 +17,18 @@
>   #include <asm/proc-fns.h>
>   #include <asm/suspend.h>
>   #include <asm/cpuidle.h>
> +#include <asm/firmware.h>
>
>   static void (*exynos_enter_aftr)(void);
>
>   static int idle_finisher(unsigned long flags)
>   {
>   	exynos_enter_aftr();
> -	cpu_do_idle();
> +	if (firmware_run())
> +		/* no need to check the return value on EXYNOS SoCs */
> +		call_firmware_op(do_idle, FW_DO_IDLE_AFTR);
> +	else
> +		cpu_do_idle();

Why not move this code into the exynos_enter_aftr() function, so 
preventing more dependency ?


>   	return 1;
>   }


--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/