Re: [RFC 11/32] xfs: convert to struct inode_time

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Monday 02 June 2014 15:04:27 Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 11:04 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > 
> >> NFSv2/3 timestamps are a pair of unsigned 32-bit values: one value for
> >> seconds since midnight GMT Jan 1, 1970, and one value for nanoseconds.
> >> (See the definition of nfstime3 in RFC 1813).
> >> 
> > 
> > nfstime3 could be extended by redefining the otherwise unused
> > nanoseconds bits{31,30} as seconds{33,32}, to give a (signed) 34-bit
> > seconds field and an unsigned 30-bit nanoseconds field.
> > 
> > This could represent 1970 +/- 272 years.
> > 
> > Servers could indicate they can understand the extended time format by
> > adding a new FSINFO capability - FSF3_CANSETTIME_EX.
> > 
> > Clients would use a new SET_TO_CLIENT_TIME_EX time_how enum when sending
> > timestamps so old servers would be protected from new clients.
> 
> You would have to get the IETFâs NFSv4 working group to sign off on
> this change. Otherwise, Linux would be the only NFSv3 implementation
> that supports the extension.
> 
> But I suspect the answer youâd get is âUse NFSv4.â

While I've never dealt with an NFS standardization, I'd assume this is
a workable answer. The NFSv2 and NFSv3 definition clearly defines a valid
range of times until 2106 using unsigned seconds, and that should really
give enough time to migrate to something better (not necessarily NFSv4).

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/