Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] seccomp: add PR_SECCOMP_EXT and SECCOMP_EXT_ACT_TSYNC

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Would you be willing to carry this series? Andy Lutomirski appears
> happy with it now. (Thanks again for all the feedback Andy!) If so, it
> has a relatively small merge conflict with the bpf changes living in
> net-next. Would you prefer I rebase against net-next, let sfr handle
> it, get carried in net-next, or some other option?

Well, I'm still not entirely convinced that we want to have this much
multiplexing in a prctl, and I'm still a bit unconvinced that the code
wouldn't be better off it it were completely atomic in the sense that
it would either work or fail without doing anything.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/