Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] seccomp: add PR_SECCOMP_EXT and SECCOMP_EXT_ACT_TSYNC

From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Mon Jun 02 2014 - 15:59:31 EST

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Would you be willing to carry this series? Andy Lutomirski appears
> happy with it now. (Thanks again for all the feedback Andy!) If so, it
> has a relatively small merge conflict with the bpf changes living in
> net-next. Would you prefer I rebase against net-next, let sfr handle
> it, get carried in net-next, or some other option?

Well, I'm still not entirely convinced that we want to have this much
multiplexing in a prctl, and I'm still a bit unconvinced that the code
wouldn't be better off it it were completely atomic in the sense that
it would either work or fail without doing anything.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at