Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names

[Tony Lindgren]

* Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> [140425 00:53]:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in property names. Support this in
> > addition to the -gpios suffix when requesting GPIOs using the new
> > descriptor-based API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> It appears this can save quite a lot of code in drivers, work that
> I trust Thierry to persue based on this to some extent so patch is
> tentatively applied unless something comes up.

Looks like this patch causes a regression where GPIOs on I2C will
no longer return -EPROBE_DEFER but seem to return -ENOENT instead.

This breaks drivers using things like devm_gpiod_get_index()
on a GPIO that's on a I2C bus not probed yet.

Reverting commit dd34c37aa3e (gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for
property names) fixes things.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/