Re: mm,console: circular dependency between console_sem and zone lock
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Mon Jun 02 2014 - 21:55:37 EST
On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 10:08:21 -0400
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/12/2014 12:28 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 07-05-14 22:03:08, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running the latest -next
> >> > kernel I've stumbled on the following spew:
> > Thanks for report. So the problem seems to be maginally valid but I'm not
> > 100% sure whom to blame :). So printk() code calls up() which calls
> > try_to_wake_up() under console_sem.lock spinlock. That function can take
> > rq->lock which is all expected.
> >
> > The next part of the chain is that during CPU initialization we call
> > __sched_fork() with rq->lock which calls into hrtimer_init() which can
> > allocate memory which creates a dependency rq->lock => zone.lock.rlock.
> >
> > And memory management code calls printk() which zone.lock.rlock held which
> > closes the loop. Now I suspect the second link in the chain can happen only
> > while CPU is booting and might even happen only if some debug options are
> > enabled. But I don't really know scheduler code well enough. Steven?
>
> I've cc'ed Peter and Ingo who may be able to answer that, as it still happens
> on -next.
>
Hmm, it failed on a try lock, but on the spinlock within the trylock. I
wonder if we should add this.
Peter?
-- Steve
diff --git a/kernel/locking/semaphore.c b/kernel/locking/semaphore.c
index 6815171..6579f84 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/semaphore.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/semaphore.c
@@ -132,7 +132,9 @@ int down_trylock(struct semaphore *sem)
unsigned long flags;
int count;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
+ if (!raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags))
+ return 1;
+
count = sem->count - 1;
if (likely(count >= 0))
sem->count = count;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/