Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] split BPF out of core networking

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 06/02/2014 09:02 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
...
> Classic has all sorts of hard coded assumptions. The whole
> concept of 'load from magic constant' to mean different things
> is flawed. We all got used to it and now think that it's normal
> for "ld_abs -4056" to mean "a ^= x"

I think everyone knows that, no? Sure it doesn't fit into the
concept, but I think at the time BPF extensions were introduced,
it was probably seen as the best trade-off available to access
useful skb fields while still trying to minimize exposure to uapi
as much as possible.

> This split is not trying to make classic easier to hack.
> With eBPF underneath classic, it got a lot easier to add extensions
> to classic, but we shouldn't be doing it.
> Classic BPF is not generic and cannot become one. It's eBPF's job.
>
> The split is mainly helping to clearly see the boundary of eBPF core
> vs its socket use case. It doesn't change or add any API.

So what's the plan with everything in arch/*/net/, tools/net/ and
in Documentation/networking/filter.txt, plus MAINTAINERS file, that
the current patch doesn't address?

We want changes to go via netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx as they always
did, since [ although other use cases pop up ] the main user, as
I said, is simply still packet filtering in various networking
subsystems, no?

> This in-kernel API cleanup was done in commit 5fe821a9dee2
> You even acked it back then :)

I agreed with that change, otherwise I wouldn't have acked it,
of course.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/