Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG_REGULATOR

[Viresh Kumar]

On 28 May 2014 23:08, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Whatever - I don't think the particular code makes any practical
> difference.  We would need to audit existing users who don't have a
> REGULATOR dependency for breakage though.

Exactly what kind of drivers are we looking to fix here? These might
be the possible cases:
- We are checking 'regulator pointer' before calling and don't need to
handle anything there..
- drivers depend on CONFIG_REGULATOR and so again we don't need
to handle anything
- None of above are true and drivers aren't checking return value of
regulator_set_voltage()
OR
They are checking it and failing when it failed..

What do we want to do in these cases?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/