Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] sched,idle: need resched polling rework
From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Tue Jun 03 2014 - 14:44:36 EST
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 07:00:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:52:22AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > > So you could cheat and set it in pick_next_task_idle() and clear in
>> > > put_prev_task_idle(), that way the entire idle loop, when running has it
>> > > set.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Isn't that a little late for sched_ttwu_pending? I guess it could be
>> > okay, but I'm hesitant to muck around with the scheduler innards that
>> > much. I don't see anything that'll break, though.
>>
>> Yeah, only later did I see you clear much earlier, which makes sense.
>
> Could we clear it from set_nr_and_not_polling()/set_nr_if_polling()?
> That's the only two functions that'll kick a cpu out of its polling
> loop, and we're already writing to the word anyhow.
I'd be nervous about this. I think it could break if
cpuidle_idle_call decides not to idle for any reason, and there is
plenty of complicated code in there.
I'm currently working on some patches that might make this clearer.
Give me a bit.
--Andy
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/