RE: [PATCH 1/7] ACPICA: Only include ACPI asm files if ACPI is enabled
From: Zheng, Lv
Date: Wed Jun 04 2014 - 21:02:11 EST
Hi,
> From: linux-i2c-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-i2c-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rafael J. Wysocki
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 5:30 AM
>
> On Wednesday, June 04, 2014 01:51:37 PM Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Jun 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, June 04, 2014 01:09:50 PM Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > Any drivers which support ACPI and Device Tree probing need to include
> > > > both respective header files. Without this patch, if a driver is being
> > > > used on a platform which does not support ACPI and subsequently does not
> > > > have the config option enabled, but includes linux/acpi.h the build
> > > > breaks with:
> > > >
> > > > In file included from ../include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:150:0,
> > > > from ../include/acpi/acpi.h:56,
> > > > from ../include/linux/match.h:2,
> > > > from ../drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:43:
> > > > ../include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h:73:23:
> > > > fatal error: asm/acenv.h: No such file or directory
> > > > #include <asm/acenv.h>
> > > > ^
> > >
> > > Which kernel does this happen with?
> >
> > a0a962d (tag: refs/tags/next-20140602, refs/remotes/next/master)
> > Add linux-next specific files for 20140602
>
> It looks like the problem is with include/linux/match.h that should not
> include acpi/acpi.h directly.
This is another example that many mis-ordered inclusions are caused by the mis-ordered <asm/acpi.h> inclusion.
>
> But I can't find this file in the Linus' next branch even, so I guess it's
> on its way to that branch?
>
I guess,
In their tree, they have CONFIG_ACPI enabled for ARM, but we've changed to make:
1. <asm/acenv.h> the architecture specific layer for ACPICA, and
2. <asm/acpi.h> is now the architecture specific layer for Linux ACPI.
So they need to follow this.
Thanks and best regards
-Lv
> Rafael
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html