Re: [PATCH 1/7] ACPICA: Only include ACPI asm files if ACPI is enabled
From: Hanjun Guo
Date: Thu Jun 05 2014 - 00:08:30 EST
Hi Lv,
On 2014-6-5 8:56, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi, Lee
>
>> From: Lee Jones [mailto:lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 8:10 PM
>>
>> Any drivers which support ACPI and Device Tree probing need to include
>> both respective header files. Without this patch, if a driver is being
>> used on a platform which does not support ACPI and subsequently does not
>> have the config option enabled, but includes linux/acpi.h the build
>> breaks with:
>>
>> In file included from ../include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:150:0,
>> from ../include/acpi/acpi.h:56,
>> from ../include/linux/match.h:2,
>> from ../drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:43:
>> ../include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h:73:23:
>> fatal error: asm/acenv.h: No such file or directory
>> #include <asm/acenv.h>
>> ^
>> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: devel@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
>> index cd1f052..fdf7663 100644
>> --- a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
>> +++ b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
>> @@ -70,9 +70,10 @@
>> #ifdef EXPORT_ACPI_INTERFACES
>> #include <linux/export.h>
>> #endif
>> -#include <asm/acenv.h>
>>
>> -#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> +#include <asm/acenv.h>
>> +#else
>
> This is exactly what I want to do in the next step.
> But you are a bit faster here.
> I believe:
> The miss-ordered inclusions of <asm/acpi.h> is the culprit of all of the miss-ordered inclusions in arch/x86/include/asm.
> You should have noted that <asm/acpi.h> was originally unexpected included by some x86 specific headers.
> Simply doing <asm/acenv.h> exlusion in this way might be able to fix your issue for your architecture, but it could be very likely breaking x86 builds.
> You might be able to find another way to solve your build issue - for example, creating an empty <asm/acenv.h> for arch/arm.
Yes, we solve this issue as you suggested for arch/arm64.
since ARM32 will not support ACPI in the near future,
we may find another way to fix it.
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/