Re: [PATCHv6 2/3] mailbox: Introduce framework for mailbox

[Jassi Brar]

On 5 June 2014 16:21, Matt Porter <mporter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:01:24AM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> Introduce common framework for client/protocol drivers and
>> controller drivers of Inter-Processor-Communication (IPC).
>>
>> Client driver developers should have a look at
>>  include/linux/mailbox_client.h to understand the part of
>> the API exposed to client drivers.
>> Similarly controller driver developers should have a look
>> at include/linux/mailbox_controller.h
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mailbox.txt        |  33 ++
>>  drivers/mailbox/Makefile                           |   4 +
>>  drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c                          | 487 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/mailbox_client.h                     |  45 ++
>>  include/linux/mailbox_controller.h                 | 121 +++++
>
> Could you please include all the DT maintainers here? It's a generic
> binding that needs wider review and an ack. The binding should be
> separated as noted below.
>
> From Documentations/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt:
>
> I. For patch submitters
>
>   0) Normal patch submission rules from Documentation/SubmittingPatches
>      applies.
>
>   1) The Documentation/ portion of the patch should be a separate patch.
>
>   2) Submit the entire series to the devicetree mailinglist at
>
>        devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Thanks. I missed CC'ing DT ML.  I remember patches with DT bindings
and parser code getting upstream... and actually see better sense in
that. But I guess I have to separate out the bindings.

Thanks
Jassi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/