Re: [PATCH 9/9] perf/x86: add syfs entry to disable HT bug workaround

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 02:55:05PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 12:16:01PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> >> On 5 June 2014 11:19, Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > How would you know that you have a uniform workload from inside
> >> > the kernel?
> >>
> >> That's what I'm asking you ;-)
> >>
> >> >> Does cpu_sibling_map not give you some indication of whether HT is
> >> >> enabled? I think the topology_thread_cpumask() is the topology API for
> >> >> that. But I could most definitely be wrong. Hopefully someone on the
> >> >> Cc list will know.
> >> >>
> >> > Remember trying some of that, but when perf_event is initialized, those
> >> > masks are not yet setup properly.
> >>
> >> Oh, bummer.
> >
> > So we init perf very early to get nmi-watchdog up and running, but
> > there's no reason you cannot register a second initcall later and flip
> > the switch from it there.
> 
> and what initcall would that be?

Pretty much anything !early_initcall() is ran after SMP bringup iirc.

Attachment: pgp2ji0WKBI3j.pgp
Description: PGP signature