[PATCH] Revert lockdep check in raw_seqcount_begin
From: Trond Myklebust
Date: Thu Jun 05 2014 - 11:31:10 EST
This commit reverts the addition of lockdep checking to raw_seqcount_begin
for the following reasons:
1) It violates the naming convention that raw_* functions should not
do lockdep checks (a convention that is also followed by the other
raw_*_seqcount_begin functions).
2) raw_seqcount_begin does not spin, so it can only be part of an ABBA
deadlock in very special circumstances (for instance if a lock
is held across the entire raw_seqcount_begin()+read_seqcount_retry()
loop while also being taken inside the write_seqcount protected area).
3) It is causing false positives with some existing callers, and there
is no non-lockdep alternative for those callers to use.
None of the three existing callers (__d_lookup_rcu, netdev_get_name, and
the NFS state code) appear to use the function in a manner that is ABBA
deadlock prone.
Fixes: 1ca7d67cf5d5: seqcount: Add lockdep functionality to seqcount/seqlock
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHQdGtRR6SvEhXiqWo24hoUh9AU9cL82Z8Z-d8-7u951F_d+5g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/seqlock.h | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index 535f158977b9..8cf350325dc6 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -164,8 +164,6 @@ static inline unsigned read_seqcount_begin(const seqcount_t *s)
static inline unsigned raw_seqcount_begin(const seqcount_t *s)
{
unsigned ret = ACCESS_ONCE(s->sequence);
-
- seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(s);
smp_rmb();
return ret & ~1;
}
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/