Re: [patch 1/2] rtmutex: Handle deadlock detection smarter

[Steven Rostedt]

On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:28:32 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> @@ -1112,7 +1134,8 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_
>  		return 1;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, detect_deadlock);
> +	/* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */
> +	ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, 1);

Why bother with passing in detect_deadlock then?

Same goes for rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock().

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/