[PATCH 3.12 100/146] nfsd4: warn on finding lockowner without stateid's

[Jiri Slaby]

From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 27b11428b7de097c42f205beabb1764f4365443b upstream.

The current code assumes a one-to-one lockowner<->lock stateid
correspondance.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index b21ed5e5b369..6f1250c14606 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -4142,6 +4142,10 @@ static bool same_lockowner_ino(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, struct inode *inode, c
 
 	if (!same_owner_str(&lo->lo_owner, owner, clid))
 		return false;
+	if (list_empty(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids)) {
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+		return false;
+	}
 	lst = list_first_entry(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids,
 			       struct nfs4_ol_stateid, st_perstateowner);
 	return lst->st_file->fi_inode == inode;
-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/