Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: EXYNOS: mcpm: Don't rely on firmware's secondary_cpu_start
From: Kevin Hilman
Date: Mon Jun 09 2014 - 14:09:12 EST
Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On exynos mcpm systems the firmware is hardcoded to jump to an address
> in SRAM (0x02073000) when secondary CPUs come up. By default the
> firmware puts a bunch of code at that location. That code expects the
> kernel to fill in a few slots with addresses that it uses to jump back
> to the kernel's entry point for secondary CPUs.
>
> Originally (on prerelease hardware) this firmware code contained a
> bunch of workarounds to deal with boot ROM bugs. However on all
> shipped hardware we simply use this code to redirect to a kernel
> function for bringing up the CPUs.
>
> Let's stop relying on the code provided by the bootloader and just
> plumb in our own (simple) code jump to the kernel. This has the nice
> benefit of fixing problems due to the fact that older bootloaders
> (like the one shipped on the Samsung Chromebook 2) might have put
> slightly different code into this location.
>
> Once suspend/resume is implemented for systems using exynos-mcpm we'll
> need to make sure we reinstall our fixed up code after resume. ...but
> that's not anything new since IRAM (and thus the address of the
> mcpm_entry_point) is lost across suspend/resume anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
I confirm that this patch (plus the enable CCI hack[1]) allows me to see
all 8 cores when booting linux-next on my Chromebook2.
Kevin
[1] While waiting for the forth-coming patch from Andrew to enable the
CCI port for the boot cluster), I do this from u-boot before starting
the kernel (based on earlier email from Doug):
mw.l 10d25000 3 # Enable CCI from U-Boot
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/