Re: HID: hid-sensor-hub: fix sleeping function called from invalid context
From: Jiri Kosina
Date: Mon Jun 09 2014 - 19:20:04 EST
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> > > while rebasing the dozens (currently around 60) of refused, ignored
> > > or similiar bugfixes and patches I need to use a Linux kernel, I've
> > > noticed that Jiri Kosinas patch here
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/9/214
> > >
> > > doesn't apply anymore.
> > >
> > > Looking why, I've seen that a similiar patch from Srinivas Pandruvada
> > > named
> > > like the topic ended up in the kernel.
> >
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > thanks for drawing this one from the boulevard of forgotten patches.
> >
> > I am actually not aware of any patch by Srinivas that would conflict with
> > the one I've written -- could you please elaborate where you believe the
> > conflict is?
> >
> > > Looking at the differences, I wonder if not all spin_lock() calls in
> > > hid-sensor-hub.c should be changed into spin_lock_irqsave() like the
> > > patch from Jiri Kosina did.
> >
>
> There is a patch submitted by "reyad.attiyat@xxxxxxxxx"
> [PATCH] HID: hid-sensor-hub: Fix lockdep warning for dynamic callback locks.
>
> Already doing this, what you suggested?
I don't see this in my mailbox at all .. so where was this submitted to,
and who merged it to which tree?
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/