Re: [RFC PATCH 02/16] sched: Introduce CONFIG_SCHED_ENERGY

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 11:20:27AM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 07:03:16AM +0100, Henrik Austad wrote:
> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 07:16:29PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > > The Energy-aware scheduler implementation is guarded by
> > > CONFIG_SCHED_ENERGY.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/Kconfig |    5 +++++
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > > index ab438cb..bfc3a85 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > 
> > Is this going to be duplicate for each architecture enabling this? Why
> > not make a kernel/Kconfig.energy and link to that from those
> > architectures using it?
> 
> kernel/Kconfig.energy is better I think.

Well, strictly speaking I'd prefer to not have more sched CONFIG knobs.

Do we really need to have this CONFIG guarded?

Attachment: pgp3RTFKqNc1F.pgp
Description: PGP signature