Re: [PATCH 3/3][update] PM / sleep: Introduce command line argument for sleep state enumeration

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Tue Jun 10 2014 - 11:08:07 EST


On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 05:23:24 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 03:12:06 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > On some systems the platform doesn't support neither
> > > PM_SUSPEND_MEM nor PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY, so PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE is the
> > > only available system sleep state. However, some user space frameworks
> > > only use the "mem" and (sometimes) "standby" sleep state labels, so
> > > the users of those systems need to modify user space in order to be
> > > able to use system suspend at all and that is not always possible.
> >
> > I'd say we should fix the frameworks, not add option to change kernel
> > interfaces.
> >
> > Because, as you mentioned, if we add this, we are probably going to
> > get stuck with it forever :-(.
>
> Unfortunately, fixing the frameworks is rather less than realistic in any
> reasonable time frame, since Android. :-)

Android is one of them. (sorry for sending prematurely).

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/