Re: [PATCH] PM: trace events for device pm callbacks

[Todd E Brandt]

Is this accepted?

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:41:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 05:17:16 PM Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:17:46 +0200
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 07:31:22 AM Todd E Brandt wrote:
> > > > Adds two trace events which supply the same info that initcall_debug 
> > > > provides, but via ftrace instead of dmesg. The existing initcall_debug
> > > > calls require the pm_print_times_enabled var to be set (either via
> > > > sysfs or via the kernel cmd line). The new trace events provide all the
> > > > same info as the initcall_debug prints but with less overhead, and also
> > > > with coverage of device prepare and complete device callbacks.
> > > > 
> > > > These events replace the device_pm_report_time event (which has been
> > > > removed). device_pm_callback_start is called first and provides the device
> > > > and callback info. device_pm_callback_end is called after with the
> > > > device name and error info. The time and pid are gathered from the trace
> > > > data headers.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Steve needs to see this (CCed).
> > 
> > The trace events look fine. Is there anything else you wanted me to
> > look at?
> 
> No, that's all, thanks!
> 
> Rafael
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/