Re: [PATCH] tools:perf: move tools/perf/util to tools/lib/perf_util

[Jean Pihet]

On 12 June 2014 14:49, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:34:32AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:26:42AM +0200, Jean Pihet escreveu:
>> > This is a first move of the perf code into a set of libraries, which
>> > allow the implementation of other external tools.
>> >
>> > The first users of the perf libraries would be:
>> > - perf itself,
>> > - the RAS daemon.
>> >
>> > The commit includes:
>> > - the move of the code from util to lib/perf_util,
>> > - creation of Makefile in perf_util,
>> > - update of Makefile.perf to build a library for perf_util,
>> > - fix of the include paths, eg. "../perf.h" to <perf.h>, "util/hist.h" to
>> >   <hist.h>
>>
>> Can't you just go moving what you actually use? Or do you really plan to
>> use all that?
>
> You asked me that same question when I was doing that. :-)
The idea is to move the re-usable code in libraries, so that other
tools than perf can use it as well.

>
> And I told Jean repeatedly that this needs to be splitted slowly, in
> smaller libraries like we've been discussing it numerous times.
Hrrr. I see it as a first move, later the rest of the code can be
moved the same way.
Now it seems that moving all from util/ at once is too much. How do
you see it happening?

Note: moving some code in the perf source is hairy enough (cf. the
simplicity of the Makefiles ;-) and so I do not want to re-do it all
over again too many times.

Thx for looking!
Jean

>
> :-\
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
>
> Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
> --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/