Re: [PATCH 1/1] ima: remove unnecessary i_mutex locking

[Mimi Zohar]

On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 20:51 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote: 
> I think i_mutex locking is absolutely unnecessary here.
> It is uselessly taken here even when IMA policy is empty and
> IMA is effectively disabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!  Please re-post with an appropriate patch description.

Mimi 
> ---
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> index 09baa33..cf1c369 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> @@ -88,8 +88,6 @@ static void ima_rdwr_violation_check(struct file *file)
>  	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || !ima_initialized)
>  		return;
> 
> -	mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);	/* file metadata: permissions, xattr */
> -
>  	if (mode & FMODE_WRITE) {
>  		if (atomic_read(&inode->i_readcount) && IS_IMA(inode)) {
>  			struct integrity_iint_cache *iint;
> @@ -104,8 +102,6 @@ static void ima_rdwr_violation_check(struct file *file)
>  			send_writers = true;
>  	}
> 
> -	mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> -
>  	if (!send_tomtou && !send_writers)
>  		return;
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/