Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: proc/stat: use usual seq_file ops rather than single_open

[David Rientjes]

On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Heiko Carstens wrote:

> Yes, that doesn't make any sense. I wrote the patch together in a hurry and
> didn't think much about it.
> So below is the what I think most simple conversion to a vmalloc fallback
> approach for seq files. However the question remains if this seems to be an
> acceptable approach at all...
> 

I think the approach is fine.  We do now have a generic kvfree() function 
defined in mm.h that will handle the freeing, though, determined by 
is_vmalloc_addr() so seq_free() is no longer necessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/