Re: [PATCH] pci: Fix unaligned access testing AF transaction pending

[Gavin Shan]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:28:07AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>pci_wait_for_pending() uses word access, so we shouldn't be passing
>an offset that is only byte aligned.  Use the control register offset
>instead, shifting the mask to match.
>
>Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Reported-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Acked-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>---
> drivers/pci/pci.c |    9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>index 759475e..81012ec 100644
>--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>@@ -3109,8 +3109,13 @@ static int pci_af_flr(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe)
> 	if (probe)
> 		return 0;
>
>-	/* Wait for Transaction Pending bit clean */
>-	if (pci_wait_for_pending(dev, pos + PCI_AF_STATUS, PCI_AF_STATUS_TP))
>+	/*
>+	 * Wait for Transaction Pending bit to clear.  A word-aligned test
>+	 * is used, so we use the conrol offset rather than status and shift
>+	 * the test bit to match.
>+	 */
>+	if (pci_wait_for_pending(dev, pos + PCI_AF_CTRL,
>+				 PCI_AF_STATUS_TP << 8))
> 		goto clear;
>
> 	dev_err(&dev->dev, "transaction is not cleared; "
>

Thanks,
Gavin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/