Re: [PATCH 10/12] percpu: use raw_cpu_() to define __this_cpu_()

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Fri Jun 13 2014 - 13:22:20 EST

Next message: Christoph Lameter: "Re: [PATCH 11/12] percpu: preffity percpu header files"
Previous message: Christoph Lameter: "Re: [PATCH 09/12] percpu: reorder macros in percpu header files"
In reply to: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 10/12] percpu: use raw_cpu_*() to define __this_cpu_*()"
Next in thread: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 12/12] percpu: invoke __verify_pcpu_ptr() from the generic part of accessors and operations"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:

> Let's layer them so that __this_cpu_*() are defined in terms of
> raw_cpu_*(). It's simpler and less error-prone this way.

Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christoph Lameter: "Re: [PATCH 11/12] percpu: preffity percpu header files"
Previous message: Christoph Lameter: "Re: [PATCH 09/12] percpu: reorder macros in percpu header files"
In reply to: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 10/12] percpu: use raw_cpu_*() to define __this_cpu_*()"
Next in thread: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 12/12] percpu: invoke __verify_pcpu_ptr() from the generic part of accessors and operations"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Re: [PATCH 10/12] percpu: use raw_cpu_*() to define __this_cpu_*()

Re: [PATCH 10/12] percpu: use raw_cpu_() to define __this_cpu_()