Re: [PATCH v3] x86,vdso: Fix vdso_install

From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Fri Jun 13 2014 - 13:28:32 EST


On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:24 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06/12/2014 10:01 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> The filenames are different now. Inspired by a patch from
>>> Sam Ravnborg.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reported-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Things look great with this version. Thanks much!
>>
>> Tested-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>
> Are we okay with the 64-bit vdso now being installed as vdso64.so?

Unless someone actually complains, I think so. Ideally, I think we'd
have a symlink from the build id, but that's a separate issue.

AFAIK, the only thing that actually references these files is Fedora's
gdb, which is finding them from Fedora's build-id symlinks, which
should work fine regardless of what the thing is called.

How's this for a patch description:

make vdso_install has been broken since this commit:

commit 6f121e548f83674ab4920a4e60afb58d4f61b829
Author: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon May 5 12:19:34 2014 -0700

x86, vdso: Reimplement vdso.so preparation in build-time C

because the names of the files to be installed changed. This fixes
vdso_install to install the right files.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/