Re: [RFC PATCH v6 04/20] iommu/arm-smmu: add capability IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP

[Alex Williamson]

On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 17:21 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:13:29PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > MSIs look just like memory accesses made by the device, so the SMMU
> > will translate them to point at the GIC ITS (doorbell). The ITS then
> > has tables to work out how to route the MSI.
> > 
> > So, if IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP is simply supposed to indicate that the
> > SMMU can translate MSIs to point somewhere else, then the ARM SMMU can
> > always do it.  If it's supposed to indicate that the actual MSI
> > payload can be filtered/routed, then that requires the GIC ITS.
> > 
> > The part I'm unsure of is how VFIO knows where to map the MSIs to.
> > That requires knowledge of the physical and virtual doorbell pages --
> > is that discoverable in the API?
> 
> VFIO does not care about the actual routing, it only cares that the
> device can not send interrupts it is not allowed to send (e.g.
> interrupts to vectors used by other devices or, on x86, exception vectors).
> If that is guaranteed by the SMMU or the GIC ITS hardware and driver
> then it is fine to set this flag.

Yep, I agree.  Thanks,

Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/