Re: [PATCH V3 00/16] irqchip: crossbar: driver fixes

[Sricharan R]

On Monday 16 June 2014 07:34 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Sricharan,
>
> On Monday 16 June 2014 07:23 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
>> This series does some cleanups, fixes for handling two interrupts
>> getting mapped twice to same crossbar and provides support for
>> hardwired IRQ and crossbar definitions.
>>
>> On certain platforms such as DRA7, SPIs 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10,
>> 131, 132, 133 are direct wired to hardware blocks bypassing
>> crossbar. This quirky implementation is *NOT* supposed to be the
>> expectation of crossbar hardware usage. This series adds support
>> to represent such hard-wired irqs through DT and avoid generic
>> allocation/programming of crossbar in the driver.
>>
>> This way of supporting hard-wired irqs was a result of
>> the below discussions.
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg329946.html
>>
>> Based on 3.15 mainline.
>>
>> All the patches are available here
>>  git@xxxxxxxxxx:Sricharanti/sricharan.git crossbar_updates
>>
>> The fixes series[1] earlier posted is merged in to this.
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg328273.html
>>
>> [V2] Merged the above series and rebased on 3.15 mainline
>>
>> [V3] Modified patch#3 to get irqs-skip properties from DT,
>>      merged path#8 for checkpatch warning to other relevant
>>      patches and fixed comments for other patches.
>>
> I scanned entire series again including your updates on Jason's
> comments. All look good to my eyes.
>
> Hopefully after this series now, we can actually enable the crossbar
> support on those machines.
>
> FWIW,
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
Thanks Santosh.

Regards,
 Sricharan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/