Re: [PATCH RFC] percpu: add data dependency barrier in percpu accessors and operations

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Tue Jun 17 2014 - 12:28:30 EST


On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:00:40PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello, Christoph.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:56:10AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Uhhh no. The percpu stuff and the associated per cpu atomics are to be
> > > used for stuff that is per cpu specific and runs at the fastest speed
> > > doable at that level. Introducing implicit barriers is not that good an
> > > idea.
> >
> > Hmmm? Read barriers are noops on all archs except for alpha and
>
> Oops, data dependency barriers, not read barrier.

Even alpha maintains the illusion of changes becoming visible in the
proper order for the currently executing thread. No barriers are needed.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/