[PATCH 3.13 041/212] vsock: Make transport the proto owner

[Kamal Mostafa]

3.13.11.4 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andy King <acking@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 2c4a336e0a3e203fab6aa8d8f7bb70a0ad968a6b ]

Right now the core vsock module is the owner of the proto family. This
means there's nothing preventing the transport module from unloading if
there are open sockets, which results in a panic. Fix that by allowing
the transport to be the owner, which will refcount it properly.

Includes version bump to 1.0.1.0-k

Passes checkpatch this time, I swear...

Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andy King <acking@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/net/af_vsock.h   |  6 +++++-
 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
index 7d64d36..4282778 100644
--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
@@ -155,7 +155,11 @@ struct vsock_transport {
 
 /**** CORE ****/
 
-int vsock_core_init(const struct vsock_transport *t);
+int __vsock_core_init(const struct vsock_transport *t, struct module *owner);
+static inline int vsock_core_init(const struct vsock_transport *t)
+{
+	return __vsock_core_init(t, THIS_MODULE);
+}
 void vsock_core_exit(void);
 
 /**** UTILS ****/
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 5adfd94..85d232b 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1925,9 +1925,23 @@ static struct miscdevice vsock_device = {
 	.fops		= &vsock_device_ops,
 };
 
-static int __vsock_core_init(void)
+int __vsock_core_init(const struct vsock_transport *t, struct module *owner)
 {
-	int err;
+	int err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&vsock_register_mutex);
+
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	if (transport) {
+		err = -EBUSY;
+		goto err_busy;
+	}
+
+	/* Transport must be the owner of the protocol so that it can't
+	 * unload while there are open sockets.
+	 */
+	vsock_proto.owner = owner;
+	transport = t;
 
 	vsock_init_tables();
 
@@ -1951,36 +1965,19 @@ static int __vsock_core_init(void)
 		goto err_unregister_proto;
 	}
 
+	mutex_unlock(&vsock_register_mutex);
 	return 0;
 
 err_unregister_proto:
 	proto_unregister(&vsock_proto);
 err_misc_deregister:
 	misc_deregister(&vsock_device);
-	return err;
-}
-
-int vsock_core_init(const struct vsock_transport *t)
-{
-	int retval = mutex_lock_interruptible(&vsock_register_mutex);
-	if (retval)
-		return retval;
-
-	if (transport) {
-		retval = -EBUSY;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	transport = t;
-	retval = __vsock_core_init();
-	if (retval)
-		transport = NULL;
-
-out:
+	transport = NULL;
+err_busy:
 	mutex_unlock(&vsock_register_mutex);
-	return retval;
+	return err;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_core_init);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__vsock_core_init);
 
 void vsock_core_exit(void)
 {
@@ -2000,5 +1997,5 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_core_exit);
 
 MODULE_AUTHOR("VMware, Inc.");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("VMware Virtual Socket Family");
-MODULE_VERSION("1.0.0.0-k");
+MODULE_VERSION("1.0.1.0-k");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/