Re: [PATCH 09/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use the same syscall names as LP64.

[Catalin Marinas]

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:02:04AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> index 1caadc2..067eab0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>  /*
>   * Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Ltd.
> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Cavium Inc.
>   *
>   * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>   * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> @@ -13,4 +14,10 @@
>   * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>   * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>   */
> +
> +/* For ILP32 AARCH64, we want to use the non compat names. */
> +#if defined(__aarch64__) && defined(__ILP32__)

Another inconsistency for !__LP64__ vs __ILP32__. BTW, do we still need
__aarch64__ check? Do we expect these headers to be used with AArch32?

> +#define __SYSCALL_NONCOMPAT

As I mentioned in a previous patch, I prefer something like
__ARCH_WANT...

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/