Re: [PATCHv4 4/4] ARM: dts: Fix wrong compatible string for Exynos3250 ADC

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi Tomasz,

On 06/18/2014 05:37 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
> 
> On 18.06.2014 04:21, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patchset fix wrong compatible string for Exynos3250 ADC. Exynos3250 SoC
>> need to control only special clock for ADC. Exynos SoC except for Exynos3250
>> has not included special clock for ADC. The exynos ADC driver can control
>> special clock if compatible string is 'exynos3250-adc-v2'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>> index 6c1fb67..107dc44 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>> @@ -414,10 +414,10 @@
>>  		};
>>  
>>  		adc: adc@126C0000 {
>> -			compatible = "samsung,exynos-adc-v3";
>> +			compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-adc-v2";
>>  			reg = <0x126C0000 0x100>, <0x10020718 0x4>;
>>  			interrupts = <0 137 0>;
>> -			clock-names = "adc", "sclk_tsadc";
>> +			clock-names = "adc", "sclk_adc";
> 
> So, is it "sclk_adc" or "sclk_tsadc"? The code uses the former, while
> the documentation mentions the latter. Please fix this.

OK, I'll fix it by using 'sclk_adc' clock name.

Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/