[PATCH kvm-unit-tests 1/5] x86: Testing nop instruction on 64-bit

[Nadav Amit]

Previously, nop instruction emulation on 64-bit caused RAX bits [63:32] to be
cleared.  This test checks the behavior is correct and RAX is unmodified.

Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 x86/emulator.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/x86/emulator.c b/x86/emulator.c
index f653127..bf8a873 100644
--- a/x86/emulator.c
+++ b/x86/emulator.c
@@ -845,6 +845,15 @@ static void test_smsw_reg(uint64_t *mem, uint8_t *insn_page,
 	report("64-bit smsw reg", outregs.rax == cr0);
 }
 
+static void test_nop(uint64_t *mem, uint8_t *insn_page,
+		uint8_t *alt_insn_page, void *insn_ram)
+{
+	inregs = (struct regs){ .rax = 0x1234567890abcdeful };
+	MK_INSN(nop, "nop\n\t");
+	trap_emulator(mem, alt_insn_page, &insn_nop);
+	report("nop", outregs.rax == inregs.rax);
+}
+
 static void test_crosspage_mmio(volatile uint8_t *mem)
 {
     volatile uint16_t w, *pw;
@@ -1045,6 +1054,7 @@ int main()
 	test_mmx_movq_mf(mem, insn_page, alt_insn_page, insn_ram);
 	test_movabs(mem, insn_page, alt_insn_page, insn_ram);
 	test_smsw_reg(mem, insn_page, alt_insn_page, insn_ram);
+	test_nop(mem, insn_page, alt_insn_page, insn_ram);
 
 	test_crosspage_mmio(mem);
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/