Re: [RESEND] shm: shm exit scalability fixes
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Jun 18 2014 - 18:55:56 EST
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:27:44 -0500 Jack Miller <millerjo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [ RESEND note: Adding relevant CCs, fixed a couple of typos in commit message,
> patches unchanged. Original intro follows. ]
>
> All -
>
> This is small set of patches our team has had kicking around for a few versions
> internally that fixes tasks getting hung on shm_exit when there are many
> threads hammering it at once.
>
> Anton wrote a simple test to cause the issue:
>
> http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/bust_shm_exit.c
>
> Before applying this patchset, this test code will cause either hanging
> tracebacks or pthread out of memory errors.
>
> After this patchset, it will still produce output like:
>
> root@somehost:~# ./bust_shm_exit 1024 160
> ...
> INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 116, t=2111
> jiffies, g=241, c=240, q=7113)
> INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
> ...
> But the task will continue to run along happily, so we consider this an
> improvement over hanging, even if it's a bit noisy.
>
> I didn't author these patches, but I'd be happy to take any feedback and
> address any issues.
As it stands, these patches will be recorded as authored by yourself.
You can override this by putting
From: Someone Else <email-address>
at the start of the changelog. Please let me know if you'd like me to
make such changes.
I agree that adding 8/16 bytes to the task_struct (if CONFIG_SYSVIPC)
is regrettable. But the poor thing is a dumping ground anyway :( I
suppose one could replace this and sysvsem with a
struct ipc_stuff *ipc_stuff; /* NULL if I never used IPC */
but there are probably lots of similar changes we could (and one day
may) make to the task_struct.
I queued the patches, tagged for 3.16-rc1 - hopefully Davidlohr and
Manfred will be able to find the time to go over them closely.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/