On Wed, Jun 18 2014, Yang,Wei wrote:Michal, Thank you for your detailed explanation, it is very helpful to me.
On 06/17/2014 10:18 PM, Alan Stern wrote:Alan's point is that if you have any doubts whether someone approves
That is a strange question to ask. If you did not know that I approvedI added your Acked-By, as when you reviewed V3, you mentioned that I
the patch, why did you insert my Acked-By:?
*may* add your Acked-by in this patch. If I misunderstood your point, I
am so sorry for that.
your patch you should *not* add their Acked-by. So adding someone's
Acked-by and then asking if they are fine with the patch is
contradictory -- the former indicates that you believe the person is
fine with the patch, while the latter shows that you aren't.
Alan wrote:
so after adding âthat changeâ you are in your right to add Alan'sWith that change, you may add
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by, but what that also means is that Alan will be fine with the
patch if you make the requested change, so you don't need to ask for an
opinion again.
PS. Note that âhaving any doubtsâ also means that if someone gave you
their Acked-by, but then you substantially rewrite the patch, you
probably should consider removing their Acked-by.