Re: [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: Properly use the "noirq" variants of suspend/resume

[Kevin Hilman]

Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The original code for the exynos i2c controller registered for the
> "noirq" variants.  However during review feedback it was moved to
> SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS without anyone noticing that it meant we were no
> longer actually "noirq" (despite functions named
> exynos5_i2c_suspend_noirq and exynos5_i2c_resume_noirq).
>
> i2c controllers that might have wakeup sources on them seem to need to
> resume at noirq time so that the individual drivers can actually read
> the i2c bus to handle their wakeup.

I suspect usage of the noirq variants pre-dates the existence of the
late/early callbacks in the PM core, but based on the description above,
I suspect what you actually want is the late/early callbacks.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/