Re: [PATCH 6/8] wlan-ng/prism2sta:checkpatch: Fix long lines
From: josh
Date: Thu Jun 19 2014 - 16:20:08 EST
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:20:18PM +0200, Johannes Stadlinger wrote:
> This patch fixes all warning of checkpatch about lines over 80
> characters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stadlinger <Johannes.Stadlinger@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Eschenbacher <maximilian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Tugce Sirin <ztugcesirin@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Neil Armstrong <superna9999@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Vitaly Osipov <vitaly.osipov@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Most of these look fine, but...
> @@ -1271,7 +1275,8 @@ void prism2sta_processing_defer(struct work_struct *data)
> HFA384x_RID_CURRENTSSID, result);
> return;
> }
> - prism2mgmt_bytestr2pstr((struct hfa384x_bytestr *) &ssid,
> + prism2mgmt_bytestr2pstr((struct hfa384x_bytestr *)
> + &ssid,
> (p80211pstrd_t *) &
> wlandev->ssid);
...that (and the one in the subsequent context lines) looks horrible.
I'd suggest breaking after the opening parenthesis of the function call
and just indenting the arguments by one tab:
foo_with_long_name(
long_arg,
another_long_arg);
Better yet, ignore checkpatch and format that call more readably as
though the 80 column rule didn't exist.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/