Re: [PATCHSET percpu/for-3.17] percpu: clean up percpu accessor and operation definitions

[Tejun Heo]

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 04:05:29PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
> > >   linus master c31c24b8251f ("Merge branch 'next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux")
> > > + [1] [PATCH RFC] percpu: add data dependency barrier in percpu accessors and operations
> >
> > Omitted the data dependency barrier and applied the series to
> > percpu/for-3.17.
> 
> Ok I hope all of that dependency material is removed from the tree?

Hmmm?  There was one RFC patch which I didn't apply.  I'm leaning
towards just clearly documenting the init write ownership because that
seems more consistent but seriously no matter which way we go there's
*no* performance implication.  I don't get why you're so fixated about
it.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/